Loading...
Preparing your workspace
Loading...
Preparing your workspace
Resolve Git merge conflicts by visualizing conflict markers, comparing changes side-by-side, accepting or rejecting changes, and generating resolved code. Supports standard Git conflict markers (<<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>) with intelligent conflict detection.
Note: AI can make mistakes, so please double-check it.
Learn what this tool does, when to use it, and how it fits into your workflow.
Git Conflict Resolver helps you fix merge conflicts in your code. It reads conflict markers from Git. It shows both versions side by side. It lets you choose which version to keep. It creates clean code without conflict markers.
Merge conflicts happen when Git cannot combine changes automatically. Two people change the same code differently. Git marks the conflicts with special lines. You must decide which changes to keep. This is hard to do manually.
Manual conflict resolution is slow. You must find conflict markers. You must read both versions. You must understand what changed. You must delete markers carefully. You must test the result. Mistakes break your code.
This tool solves these problems. It finds conflicts automatically. It shows changes clearly. It lets you choose with buttons. It removes markers for you. It shows the result instantly.
This tool is for developers who use Git. It is for anyone who merges code branches. You need basic Git knowledge. You do not need advanced skills.
Git tracks changes in files. When you merge branches, Git combines changes. Sometimes the same lines change in both branches. Git cannot decide which version to keep. It creates a conflict.
Git marks conflicts with special lines. The marker <<<<<<< shows the start. It includes your branch name. The code after this marker is your version. The marker ======= separates the versions. The code after this is the incoming version. The marker >>>>>>> shows the end. It includes the other branch name.
People struggle with conflicts manually. They must find all markers in large files. They must read both code versions. They must understand what each version does. They must decide which is correct. They must delete markers carefully. They must keep the right code. This takes time and causes errors.
Conflict resolution requires careful reading. You must compare code line by line. You must understand context. You must check if both versions are needed. You must ensure the result works. Missing a marker breaks the file. Keeping wrong code breaks functionality.
This tool automates the hard parts. It finds all conflict markers automatically. It separates your code and incoming code. It shows them side by side for easy comparison. It lets you choose with simple buttons. It removes markers and combines code correctly. It shows the final result so you can verify it.
Developers resolve merge conflicts after pulling changes. They paste conflicted code into the tool. They compare both versions side by side. They choose the correct version. They copy the resolved code back. They commit the fix.
Teams merge feature branches into main. Multiple conflicts appear in the same file. They use the tool to resolve each conflict. They check the live preview after each choice. They ensure the final code works correctly.
Developers review incoming changes during merges. They use AI analysis to understand differences. They see what each version does. They make informed decisions. They avoid breaking existing functionality.
Code reviewers check conflict resolutions. They paste resolved code into the tool. They see what choices were made. They verify the result is correct. They suggest improvements if needed.
Developers learn conflict resolution. They load sample conflicts. They practice choosing versions. They see how the tool works. They understand Git conflict markers better.
The tool parses conflict markers using pattern matching. It scans each line of input text. It looks for lines starting with <<<<<<<. This marks the start of a conflict.
Conflict extraction works like this. When it finds a start marker, it reads lines until it finds =======. All lines between are your version. It reads lines after ======= until it finds >>>>>>>. All lines between are incoming version. It extracts branch names from marker lines.
Code separation preserves original formatting. The tool keeps line breaks. It keeps indentation. It keeps all code exactly as written. It only removes conflict markers when resolving.
Resolution logic combines your choices. If you choose ours, it keeps only your code. If you choose theirs, it keeps only their code. If you choose both, it combines them in order. Your code comes first, then their code, separated by a line break.
Serialization rebuilds the file. It goes through all blocks in order. For normal code blocks, it keeps them unchanged. For resolved conflicts, it inserts the chosen code. For unresolved conflicts, it keeps original markers. It joins all blocks with line breaks.
Conflict counting tracks progress. The tool counts how many conflicts exist. It counts how many you resolved. It shows the ratio. It marks conflicts as resolved when you choose a side.
Input validation prevents errors. The tool limits input to 500,000 characters. It limits lines to 50,000. It limits line length to 10,000 characters. It truncates excess content. It shows error messages for invalid input.
Paste complete conflict sections. Include all conflict markers. Include code before and after conflicts. This ensures correct parsing. Missing markers cause errors.
Read both versions carefully before choosing. Understand what each version does. Check if both are needed. Use AI analysis if unsure. Make informed decisions.
Use the live preview to verify results. Check the preview after each choice. Ensure code structure is correct. Look for syntax errors. Fix issues before copying.
Resolve conflicts one at a time. Work through each conflict card. Do not skip conflicts. Ensure all are resolved before copying.
Test resolved code after pasting. Run your code to check it works. Fix any issues that appear. Do not assume the tool is always correct.
The tool handles standard Git markers only. It recognizes <<<<<<<, =======, and >>>>>>>. It does not handle custom conflict formats. Use standard Git merge for best results.
Very large files may be truncated. The tool limits input to 500KB. Files larger than this are cut off. Split large files if needed. Or resolve conflicts in sections.
AI analysis may be unavailable sometimes. The service requires backend connection. If analysis fails, resolve manually. Read code differences yourself. Make decisions based on code review.
Empty conflict sections are handled. If one side has no code, the tool shows empty. You can still choose that side. The result will be empty code.
Malformed conflicts may not parse correctly. Missing separators cause errors. The tool tries to handle edge cases. But perfect markers work best.
Branch names are extracted from markers. They appear in conflict headers. They help identify where changes came from. Use them for context.
Copy the result immediately after resolving. The tool does not save your work. Refreshing the page loses progress. Copy resolved code before leaving.
Review the final code structure. Ensure all conflict markers are gone. Check that code flows correctly. Verify indentation is preserved. Fix formatting if needed.
Summary: Resolve Git merge conflicts by visualizing conflict markers, comparing changes side-by-side, accepting or rejecting changes, and generating resolved code. Supports standard Git conflict markers (<<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>) with intelligent conflict detection.
Supports standard Git conflict markers (`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, `>>>>>>>`)
Common questions about this tool
Paste your conflicted code into the resolver. The tool automatically detects conflict markers (<<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>), shows both versions side-by-side, and allows you to accept, reject, or manually edit changes to resolve conflicts.
The resolver supports standard Git conflict markers: <<<<<<< (current branch), ======= (separator), and >>>>>>> (incoming branch). It automatically detects and highlights these markers for easy resolution.
Yes, the tool can handle multiple conflict sections in a single file. It identifies all conflicts, allows you to resolve each one individually, and generates the final resolved code with all conflicts removed.
Stay tuned for helpful articles, tutorials, and guides about this tool. We regularly publish content covering best practices, tips, and advanced techniques to help you get the most out of our tools.