Loading...
Preparing your workspace
Loading...
Preparing your workspace
Check and validate software licenses from package.json, requirements.txt, and other dependency files. Identify license types (MIT, Apache, GPL, etc.), detect license compatibility issues, and verify compliance with open-source license requirements for multiple platforms (npm, PyPI, Maven, etc.).
Note: AI can make mistakes, so please double-check it.
Learn what this tool does, when to use it, and how it fits into your workflow.
The License Checker tool validates and classifies software license keys. You can paste a single key or a list of keys, and the tool analyzes each one against a rich set of patterns to decide whether it looks valid, invalid, flagged, or unknown. For every key it reports a status, a confidence score, a human readable explanation, and a type classification, and it persists results in a history panel for later review.
This tool addresses a real problem in software operations and support. Teams often encounter license strings from many vendors in many different formats. Determining whether a key is structurally valid, possibly spoofed, or obviously broken can take time and requires knowledge of common patterns. The License Checker centralizes this knowledge and runs quick, consistent checks on single keys or entire batches.
It is intended for support engineers, system administrators, QA testers, and developers who manage product activations, troubleshoot licensing issues, or vet keys during migrations. The interface supports both quick, one-off checks and larger batch validations, and it includes optional AI insights that provide additional interpretation of individual keys.
Software license keys come in many formats. Some vendors use five blocks of five characters for product keys, others use UUID-like strings, and others rely on long hexadecimal or Base64 encodings. On the surface these keys look similar: long strings of characters, often with dashes. Underneath, they follow patterns that indicate the platform, product family, and sometimes encode checksums or metadata.
When a support engineer receives a key from a customer, the first question is often: “Does this key even look like one of ours?” If it is obviously too short, contains unexpected symbols, or violates a known pattern, it may be invalid or tampered with. If it matches a well known pattern for a product family, it is more likely to be a legitimate key, though further checks may still be required.
The License Checker does not contact vendor activation servers or perform online verification. Instead, it focuses on structural and heuristic checks. It identifies patterns used by Windows and Office product keys, UUID-based licenses, generic commercial software keys, hex encoded tokens, Base64-style blobs, and common serial number formats. It then assigns a status and confidence percentage based on how closely the input matches these patterns and on additional factors like suspicious characters or unexpected length.
In addition to pattern matching, the tool can call an AI backend for deeper narrative analysis of a given key. This AI analysis does not change the base status or confidence but can add context such as “likely trial key”, “format used by enterprise subscriptions”, or “looks like an encoded token that must be decoded first.”
A common use case is triaging a license key reported by a user. A support agent can paste the key into single mode, validate it, and quickly see whether it matches expected formats for known products. If the key is structurally invalid or highly suspicious, the agent can provide immediate feedback without involving activation servers.
Another scenario is auditing a CSV or text export of license keys from a legacy system. Using bulk mode and file upload, an engineer can load hundreds or thousands of keys and review which ones are structurally valid, which ones look unusual, and which are clearly broken or incomplete.
Teams that need to migrate customers from one licensing system to another can run large batches of keys to identify patterns. The type and explanation fields make it clear which keys belong to particular vendor schemes and which may require special handling.
Finally, educators and security researchers can use the tool to explore common license patterns and see how heuristics classify different strings. AI analysis adds extra context that can help explain why certain keys look more or less trustworthy from a purely structural standpoint.
The core validation logic starts by trimming whitespace and enforcing maximum length for each key. Keys longer than the configured maximum are immediately marked invalid with a 100 percent confidence score and an explanation indicating that they exceed the allowed length.
The tool then tests each key against several regular expression patterns. These patterns include a five-by-five Windows style key format with dashes, a 25 character variant without dashes, a UUID format, long hex-only strings, Base64-like strings, generic serial number formats, and hyphenated commercial software formats. Each matched pattern leads to a specific combination of type, status, confidence, and explanation.
Some patterns apply additional heuristics. For example, Windows style keys are checked for characters that vendors typically avoid (0, 1, L, O, S, U) to reduce user confusion. Keys with these characters may still receive a “Valid” or “Flagged” status but with adjusted confidence and more cautious explanations.
Fallback branches catch very short keys, keys with unusual special characters, extremely long keys, or generic alphanumeric strings. In these cases the tool may mark the key as Invalid or Flagged and uses lower confidence scores and explanations that highlight potential format anomalies.
Batch validation splits the input text on line breaks, trims each line, discards empty entries, and enforces a maximum number of keys per batch. It then calls the same validation logic for each remaining line and collects the results into an array for display. Errors in batch processing are caught and turned into a single invalid result with an explanation.
AI insights are requested with the raw key string.
The service is called through a backend helper which wraps a geminiService.executeGemini call and returns plain text.
The frontend attaches this text to the appropriate result and history entry, and falls back to generic messages when the call fails or the response is empty.
Remember that this tool focuses on structural validation and pattern recognition, not actual license activation. A key that appears valid here may still be expired, revoked, or unassigned in your licensing system. You should always consult your official licensing backend for final decisions.
Avoid pasting real customer license keys when you do not have to, especially when using shared machines. Use the sample keys and artificial examples when experimenting or demonstrating the tool to others.
When working with bulk data, watch the size and key count limits. If you need to process larger files, consider splitting them into smaller chunks first so the browser stays responsive and validations finish quickly.
Treat AI analyses as advisory. They can highlight likely intent or risk patterns, but final interpretations should be grounded in your licensing policies, contracts, and legal advice. Use them to inform questions, not to replace formal checks.
Finally, use the history panel to create an internal reference of keys you have assessed. It lets you revisit earlier checks, compare patterns, and avoid revalidating the same keys repeatedly, saving time during long support sessions or audits.
Summary: Check and validate software licenses from package.json, requirements.txt, and other dependency files. Identify license types (MIT, Apache, GPL, etc.), detect license compatibility issues, and verify compliance with open-source license requirements for multiple platforms (npm, PyPI, Maven, etc.).
No history yet
Common questions about this tool
Upload your package.json (npm), requirements.txt (Python), pom.xml (Maven), or other dependency files. The checker analyzes all dependencies, identifies their licenses, and provides a comprehensive report showing license types, compatibility, and any potential compliance issues.
The checker supports licenses from npm (package.json), PyPI (requirements.txt, setup.py), Maven (pom.xml), and other package managers. It recognizes common licenses like MIT, Apache 2.0, GPL, BSD, ISC, and many others across different platforms.
Yes, the checker identifies license compatibility problems, such as mixing copyleft licenses (GPL) with permissive licenses (MIT), which can create legal issues. It flags potential conflicts and provides guidance on resolving license compatibility problems.
The checker uses official package registries and license databases to identify licenses with high accuracy. It checks package metadata, LICENSE files, and official registry information to provide reliable license identification for your dependencies.
Yes, you can check licenses for entire dependency trees at once. The checker processes all dependencies in your package files, providing a comprehensive license report that includes direct dependencies, transitive dependencies, and their license information.
Stay tuned for helpful articles, tutorials, and guides about this tool. We regularly publish content covering best practices, tips, and advanced techniques to help you get the most out of our tools.